The BatCAT consortium kick-off meeting is underway in Ås, Norway in which GCL is a partner organisation. The meeting will run 11–13 March 2024.

The Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) is a splendid venue and provides a great opportunity for all of the 18 project partners to get to know one another and discuss the overall aims and goals of the project.

The BatCAT project will strive to create a digital twin for battery manufacturing. The project also forms part of the Battery 2030+ initiative that works to define best practice in battery research and ensure a strong European battery knowledge-base for future generations.

Thank you to the project coordinators at NMBU for organising the consortium meeting and the supporting training sessions and lectures. To see more photos from this event click here. Photo credits to Razieh Kaveh and Gerhard Goldbeck.

Science Communication and Social Media Work as Part of the OntoTrans Project

Or – Who are our OntoTrans fans?

By Alexandra Simperler, Laura Waslmayr, Xiran Dong, Vikki Cantrill, Ernst-Dieter Janotka, Gerhard Goldbeck, and Nadja Adamovic

Acknowledgements

This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 862136 (OntoTrans Project). The authors thank all the survey participants for taking the time to respond to our questions.

A version of record of this work is available here.

The Move to Open Translations Environments
Sending a Clear Message
Our Online Look
Who are You?
Our Visibility
OntoTrans LinkedIn Analytics
MatCHMaker LinkedIn Analytics
EMMC LinkedIn Analytics
What we Asked
Our Survey Said…!
LinkedIn Community
Who Tweets?
Instagram picks
Conclusion
Survey link

The Move to Open Translations Environments

Research and development (R&D) in materials and manufacturing industries are facing the need to integrate data and discover complex knowledge from ever more diverse sources. Data are stored in often disparate, non-standardised repositories and score poorly in terms of their FAIR attributes. Furthermore, over the last few decades, advances in materials modelling have evolved to the extent that models provide a further source of data in industrial R&D. Providing easier access to all of these data sources to a broader spectrum of R&D scientists and engineers is a key differentiator for successful innovation built on faster and better-informed decision-making.

These changes have fuelled the need for a digital transition, to bring together data and knowledge into an interoperable system, to discover new knowledge and answer complex queries. Globally, such digital transitions help address green and sustainability concerns. Individual businesses benefit from improvements in efficiency and accessibility to enable faster decision-making, which reduces costs, enhances customer experience, and ensures a business can remain competitive.

OntoTrans is an EU-funded project that works to provide an ontology-based open translation environment in materials modelling and manufacturing. The project includes people from universities, research and development organisations, consultants, software developers, and materials manufacturing companies.

The diverse nature of the project means that many scientists and business experts may be interested in the work that we do, so getting the message out about the results and benefits of our work to a broad audience is essential.

Sending a Clear Message

Over recent years, science communication has become arguably a more important and integral part of a project’s success with the need to provide information about project results and outreach activities to specialists and the general public alike. Scientists often attend conferences and training sessions, and get involved with science projects, but they often feel less equipped and able to communicate with the general public.

The internet has made communication between scientists and the public easier and faster than ever before, so effective science communication is essential to share and promote accurate information and encourage engagement. This is particularly important because online, specialist and public professional communications are not separate. Furthermore, the importance of illustrations/visual content in science dissemination work cannot be overstated; content needs to be both engaging and accessible, so effective use of social media platforms is key.

Indeed, effective science communication is a general obligation for all recipients of EU funding to ensure EU visibility. A comprehensive strategy and plan for communication and dissemination activities is called for at the beginning of all projects, which serves as a basis for evaluations during the project’s life cycle. Despite the emphasis on public communication, it is not always possible to understand the reach of these efforts and so any insights, for example from surveys, can serve to inform and improve approaches to project result dissemination.

During our project, we have looked to maximise our science communication and dissemination activities, and we are keen to understand who we were reaching with our efforts and get know a little more about what was learned and why it was of interest. In fact, if you are reading this article, this means you!

Our Online Look

From the outset, OntoTrans had a dedicated look and feel for all forms of communication to ensure consistent branding throughout the project by all partners. Our colour scheme comes in rose and turquoise and it displays the project name in a circle. A third-party graphics designer was commissioned with this task and supplied with a project description.

These logos and the colour scheme create a project identity and to promote public identification and recognition of our work. OntoTrans is a portmanteau of ontology and translation. The colouring and different fonts gives “Onto” and “Trans” their individuality and the circle combines them as we do in our project.

For LinkedIn, we used the rose colour scheme, and displayed the logo and a banner:

The same colour scheme was used for Twitter/X:

We kept our Instagram header sleek:

However, we created turquoise and rose posts, except for the first pinned post that is grey. The first post differs because it introduces the reader to what our project is and does. Thes going forward, rose-coloured content has been associated with introductory/less-difficult content and turquoise posts have been used to deliver more involved topics. We chose to post with the colours alternating to achieve a mosaic effect of the turquoise and rose tiles because Instagram shows an overview of three posts in a row. The graphics were selected from Canva and we aligned the colour scheme with their editing tools.

Who are You?

To shed light on the perception of our science communication activities, we conducted an online survey that targeted social media users who would most likely be interested in the OntoTrans project. To do so, we reached out to people interested in the H2020 project OntoTrans, associated Horizon Europe project MatCHMaker, and people involved with the European Materials Modelling Council (EMMC), who kindly assisted by promoting our survey.

To understand our audience, we analysed how people consumed our content on the social media platforms that we use to disseminate OntoTrans project results – LinkedIn, Twitter/X and Instagram – based on your survey responses in 2022.

Briefly, survey responses spanned all age groups, which implies the project is known to young researchers, scientists, entrepreneurs and experienced professionals and most were from Europe (84%). Respondents were, on the whole, affiliated with universities (50%), but with research centres (16%) and industry (10%) also represented and primarily from the engineering and physics sector. The job roles that people held were also spread from the most junior to the most senior. We also aim to reach the general public and raise awareness of our work, however, on this occasion, the general invite was open but promoted by means of LinkedIn.

Our Visibility

To get a little bit of insight into who reads the content that we publish, we looked at our recent analytics numbers on LinkedIn. LinkedIn analytical data was used in this instance because we are able to gain information about the location and background of the people who view our content unlike analytical data from Twitter/X and Instagram.

OntoTrans LinkedIn Analytics

Between November 2022 and November 2023, the OntoTrans project LinkedIn page had 363 page views by 163 unique visitors from within Europe.

People visiting the OntoTrans LinkedIn page were from research services (40.2%), software development (15.4%) and IT services and IT consulting (8.3%). A good number of these visitors had careers associated with media and communication (26.4%) or research (15.4%), with a fairly even split between junior (39.9%) and senior/manager (35.8%) staff.

MatCHMaker LinkedIn Analytics

The MatCHMaker project opened its account in March 2023. To November 2023, its LinkedIn page received 652 page views and 262 unique visitors mostly from Europe. Visitors typically worked in research services (40.2%), other industries include business consulting and services (9.4%), non-governmental organisations (8.9%) and industrial machinery manufacturing (6.1%).

Visitors’ careers included media and communication (19.2%), research (16%), engineering (14%) and information technology (8.3%) alongside other sectors, such as education and business development.

Interestingly, a larger proportion of visitors were junior staff (46.6%) relative to senior staff (27.6%), directors (9.7%).

EMMC LinkedIn Analytics

From November 2022–November 2023, EMMC had 797 page views and 354 unique visitors, with almost all visitors being based in Europe. The spread of industries and job functions were similar to those seen for OntoTrans and MatCHMaker.

In contrast to the two projects above, the EMMC attracts slightly more senior-level visitors (41%) than junior ones (31.1%), which perhaps reflects the EMMC membership demographic.

What we Asked

According to Statista, the daily time spent on social media across all ages groups is significant relative to time spent consuming other forms of media.

So, we asked questions about three social media platforms:

• LinkedIn – a primarily professional environment
• X (then known as Twitter) – a short-form post site used for personal and professional updates and news
• Instagram – used both personally and professionally with an emphasis on visual and multimedia content

As of January 2023, the majority (61%) of Instagram users are aged between 18–34. The challenge here is to make content creative, engaging and informative for the primary users to help aid dissemination to reach the general public.

The EUSurvey service supported by the European Commission’s DEP-Interoperability programme was used. The survey was promoted through the EMMC, OntoTrans and the personal social media accounts of some of the project participants. In total, 84 complete responses were received and evaluated.

Questions about geographical location, age, sector and career stage alongside questions on social media usage were posed. We asked about online identity, purpose, frequency, behaviour (type of engagement) and preferences about the three platforms selected for study.

Our Survey Said…!

For science communication to be effective, you need to know your audience, and our projects are no different. When we consider audiences for our social media work, we broadly make the following assumptions. Our audience aged 20–30 years attends university, does research, and is in the early stages of their career, so we want to let them know about OntoTrans and the technology behind it, and raise awareness of careers in this sector. Those aged 31–40 are likely established in their careers and develop new knowledge through continued professional development or independent learning, so papers, articles, and training materials are useful to this group and social media helps to steer them towards suitable materials.

For the 41–50-year-old audience, who may already occupy senior roles, we aim to provide more strategic information about the OntoTrans project and its related technology, ontologies and semantic data analyses to add to their portfolio of ideas. And for anyone aged 51 or above, we aim to raise awareness and keep them up to date with our project. Feedback and engagement with our project are welcomed. We want to present our ideas and are keen to hear comments and advice. A summary of the results is in the table below.

LinkedIn Community

FFrom our survey we discovered that respondents were interested in and active on LinkedIn. People primarily log on in a professional capacity, as expected, either daily or weekly. Younger respondents were typically more interested in careers and networking opportunities, whereas older people wanted news and information about leaders in their respective areas of interest. The older a respondent was, the more likely they were to actively post and comment, or post on behalf of an organisation.

Who Tweets?

Similar patterns of use were seen when respondents were asked about their use of Twitter/X as for LinkedIn. Older respondents were more likely to actively engage by commenting, reposting or posting on behalf of an organisation. A concise, entertaining yet professional style for content was preferred with the oldest and youngest users mentioning their interest in reading about events.

Instagram picks

The primarily video- and photo-focussed platform, Instagram, is well known to be popular with younger users. Interestingly, our survey respondents of all ages used Instagram regularly, with the oldest age group being the most represented. Instagram, the fourth largest social media platform, is typically used more in a private capacity. Here, older users are known to log in from time to time to keep up to date with the lives and events of friends and family. All users preferred informal and entertaining content with the oldest and youngest users the most likely to share and comment.

The allure of Instagram attracts younger users with many opting to view posts more than once a day. They will search for content that they find interesting, both personally and professionally, and readily share these with their friends.

Other age groups typically interact on Instagram on a weekly basis and engage with content of particular interest both personal and professional. Overall, the expectation of users is that this informal platform should be enjoyable and entertaining to use.

Conclusion

Science communication has long been a key component of research studies, but the immediacy of social media platforms enables quick and easy access to the most up-to-date information. Science communicators are bridging the gap between scientists and the general public with these contemporary tools.

As expected, our findings confirm that the different platforms need to be treated slightly differently when planning and publishing content. LinkedIn, as a networking tool, requires posts with a professional focus. Twitter/X posts benefit from concise and precise messages to encourage engagement. And Instagram, with the youngest audience globally, values informal content.

We are grateful to all survey participants. Their responses and insights have informed and helped us to further develop our effective communication and dissemination strategy; the insights from which project partners can take forward into future projects.

The results also enable us to explore new ways to educate and entertain a global audience to make science and technology ever more accessible and inclusive. Here, Instagram is an unconventional channel for communicating EU research project activities yet has the potential to reach a broader and younger audience than through other social media platforms with its more relaxed format.

Disclaimer

All information contained in this study and any opinions expressed in it are intended to share the insights the authors have gained on a survey on social media usage during their work on the H2020 Project OntoTrans. All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in the report are those of the authors. The information used and statements of fact made are not guarantees, warranties or representations as to their completeness or accuracy. The authors assume no liability for any short- or long-term professional decisions made by any reader based on analysis included in this report.

 

EMMO authors are pleased to announce the first pre-release of the European Materials & Modelling Ontology (EMMO). It marks a major milestone in the development of a new standard representational framework (the ontology) for applied sciences.

The release consists of

• EMMO Top Level ontology, which includes the fundamental axioms that constitute the philosophical foundation of the EMMO.
• EMMO Middle Level ontology, which includes a set of perspectives to be used for the development of more specialised domain ontologies.

The Middle level is also where cross-domain ontologies are included. In the EMMO 1.0.0-alpha release there is a metrology branch including the International System of Quantities and SI system, laying the foundation for a semiotic-based property system in EMMO.

Next alpha releases will include the following Middle Level developments:

• Chemical composition
• Extension of the physical quantities set
• Position-based symbolic structures (e.g. list, array)

Also, a test suite for checking sub-modules against the EMMO convention is planned.

The release and further information can be accessed via the EMMO Github repository https://github.com/emmo-repo

7-8 November 2017,  St John’s Innovation Centre, Cambridge

 

Materials Modelling has become an essential part of research, development, engineering and upscaling of advanced materials in a wide range of industry sectors. Its success is based on a number of breakthrough and by now well established models and software tools originating from different scientific and engineering communities. Examples are Density Functional Theory, Phase Field Models and of course continuum mechanics and fluid dynamics based model. The impact of utilising these approaches has been widely documented in case studies and impact assessments. For many industrial applications, a combination of methods must be applied hence requiring more and more integration and interoperability, both in terms of software but also scientific aspects of the workflows (i.e. how the outputs from one model connect to the physics quantities of another model). Data required for and produced by simulations need to be managed and stored with appropriate metadata in order to enable their re-use and data analytics. Integration of materials modelling into the R&D enterprise in the age of Industry 4.0 requires the whole field to step back and work together on interoperability solutions that go much beyond stringing together some workflows with syntactically based scripting. It calls for interoperability solutions that are based in semantic approaches with metadata backed up by an ontology framework.

Purpose and objective of the workshop

The purpose is to discuss recent developments in interoperability approaches in materials modelling, following on from discussions at the First EMMC International Workshop (Notes from that event will be available to workshop delegates). In particular, the workshop will focus on semantic interoperability based on a future European Materials Modelling Ontology (EMMO). Definitions of some of the terms in such an ontology are the subject of a CEN Workshop Agreement.

Communication standards between models and databases will also be discussed, including initial requirements for cataloguing simulations in data repositories, and general requirements for Translation and Training components with a view to integration into future Materials Modelling Marketplaces.

EMMC is seeking support of the wider materials modelling community for the development of a European Materials Modelling Ontology as a basis for interoperability and domain specific metadata.

Participants

Representatives from the academic and industrial materials modelling community covering different types of models and applications, database repository owners and project representatives. The workshop is limited to 50-60 experts.

Draft Agenda

7^th November 2017

10:00 – 10:30      Arrival, Refreshments

10:30 -10:40       Introduction to the Workshop
Gerhard Goldbeck (Goldbeck Consulting Ltd) and Adham Hashibon (Fraunhofer IWM)

Session 1: Status and requirements for interoperability

10:40 -11:00       Data and modelling integration at Dow
Hein Koelman (Dow Chemical)

11:00- 11:20       Materials Modelling and Interoperability – Siemens PLM Vision
Stijn Donders (Siemens PLM)

11:20 – 11:40      Ontology requirements for software realisation
Wolfgang Wenzel (KIT and Nanomatch)

11:40 – 12:00      Augmenting measurements data with physico-chemical simulation for a non-road machine application
Amit Bhave (CMCL Innovations)

12:00 – 12:30      Interoperability  approaches and implementations in current EU Projects
Borek Patzak (Czech Technical University; CompoSelector Project), Adham Hashibon (Fraunhofer IWM, FORCE Project), Jesper Friis (SINTEF, NanoSim Project)

12:30 – 13:30      Lunch

Session 2: Ontologies for interoperability

13:30 – 14:00      Introduction to the Industry Ontologies Foundry
Barry Smith (University of Buffalo)

14:00 – 14:45      Big Data Transforms Into Big Analysis: The Convergence of Formal Semantics & Data Science in Life Sciences
Eric Little (Osthus)

14:45 – 15:15      Ontologies and rule-based knowledge in Knowledge-Driven Optimization
Piotr Maciol (AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow)

15:15 – 15:45      Break

15:45 – 16:15      European Materials Modelling Ontology (EMMO)
Emanuele Ghedini (University of Bologna), Adham Hashibon (Fraunhofer IWM), Jesper Friis (SINTEF), Gerhard Goldbeck (GCL), Georg Schmitz (ACCESS), Anne de Baas (EC DG RTD NMBP)

16:15 – 17:15      Interoperability Discussion and Action planning
Moderator: Gerhard Goldbeck

19:30 – 21:30      Dinner at Hilton Hotel Cambridge                           

8^th November 2017

Session 3: Data and documentation

09:00 – 09:30      Materials Modelling Data and Documentation: terminology, classification and ontology towards Digital Single Market
Anne de Baas (EC DG RTD NMBP)

09:30 – 10:00      Simulation documentation with Materials Modelling data tables (MODA): portal demo
Adham Hashibon (Fraunhofer IWM)

10:00 – 10:30      NOMAD Metadata for all
Fawzi Mohamed (Fritz-Haber-Institut and NOMAD Project)

10:30 – 11:00      Coffee break

Session 4: Materials Modelling Marketplaces

11:00 – 11:30      Workflows and data integration, vision and sustainability
Nicola Marzari (EPFL)

11:30 – 12:00      On system thinking, knowledge synthesis and data-driven analytics
Katya Vladislavleva (DataStories Int.)

12:00 – 12:30      European Materials Modelling Marketplaces
Welchy Leite Cavalcanti (Fraunhofer IFAM, VIMMP Project), Adham Hashibon (Fraunhofer IWM, MarketPlace Project), Gerhard Goldbeck (GCL), Nicola Marzari (EPFL, MaterialsCloud), Sergio Lopez Lopez (SCM, Fortissimo Project)

12:30 – 13:30      Lunch

13:30 – 14:00      Connecting to infrastructure
Jörg Meyer (Steinbuch Centre for Computing, KIT)

14:00 – 14:30      Building a materials modeling marketplace: challenges for SME’s and research organisations
Didrik Pinte (Enthought)

14:30- 15:15       Panel on Materials Modelling Marketplaces including ontology, repository, workflow management, curation and sustainability
David Cebon (Granta Design), Eric Little, Katya Vladislavleva, Welchy Leite Cavalcanti, Nicola Marzari, Adham Hashibon;
Chair: Anne de Baas

15:15 – 16:00      Marketplaces Discussion and Action planning
Moderator: Adham Hashibon

16:00 – 16:15      Closing remarks
Gerhard Goldbeck, Adham Hashibon, Anne de Baas

 

Organisation and contact

EMMC partner Goldbeck Consulting Ltd manages the organisation of the workshop. For further information and to register your interest in participating, please contact:
emmc@goldbeck-consulting.com